Two NLPs of Human Psychology, AI Systems, and Staying Aware

---

NLP.
Three letters that point to two very different things. Both rooted in language. Both powerful. Both quietly shaping how we think, feel, and act every day.

One comes from human psychology.
The other from machine intelligence.

Understanding the difference, and the overlap, helps us see the subtle nudges running through conversations, marketing, media, and now our interactions with AI.

Neuro-Linguistic Programming emerged in the 1970s as a way of exploring how neurology, language, and learned patterns interact to create our experience of reality. Its starting point is simple. We don’t experience the world directly. We experience our filtered version of it.

Those filters are often sensory. Some people orient visually, others auditorily, others through feeling and movement. This shows up clearly in everyday language.

“I see what you mean.”
“That sounds right.”
“It feels off.”

The insight was that these patterns aren’t random. The words we use often reflect how we organize experience internally. When language, attention, posture, or tone shift, experience can shift too.

Used lightly, NLP can be practical and experiential. Changes tend to show up in the nervous system first. Ease. Tension. Clarity. Agitation. Rather than as intellectual insight. It has also been criticized, often fairly, for overstated claims and weak empirical grounding. Still, many people have found it useful as a communication and self-awareness toolkit when it isn’t treated as a cure-all or a belief system.

Natural Language Processing, on the other hand, is what allows computers to work with human language at all. It powers chatbots, translation tools, voice assistants, search engines, and sentiment analysis.

At a basic level, language is broken into pieces. Patterns are learned from massive datasets. Responses are generated by predicting which words are most likely to come next. Modern systems don’t understand meaning the way humans do. They calculate probability. Because they’re trained on vast amounts of human language, the results can feel surprisingly human.

That distinction matters.

AI doesn’t experience language.
It models it.

This is where the two NLPs begin to overlap.

Both shape perception through language. Human NLP does this through words, tone, pacing, and sensory cues. AI does it by predicting what will keep you engaged, reassured, or continuing the interaction.

When you interact with AI, it mirrors your vocabulary, cadence, and emotional tone. That isn’t empathy. It’s pattern recognition responding as designed. The effect can feel relational, but the mechanism is statistical.

The difference is scale and speed. AI does this instantly, across enormous numbers of interactions, without fatigue, emotion, or lived context. That makes awareness more important, not less.

Beneath all of this is a quieter layer of words, stories, and the reality they shape.

Most of the world we move through each day isn’t raw experience. It’s a world made of narratives, identities, explanations, promises, fears, and goals. Not a sci-fi matrix. A linguistic one.

Language is how meaning gets layered onto sensation. It’s how experiences are packaged, remembered, shared, and reinforced. Over time, stories become identities. Identities become habits. Habits start to feel like who we are.

But neither the body nor being speaks in language.
They speak in sensation, impulse, rhythm, emotion, and movement.

Language is secondary. A translation layer applied after experience, not the source of it.

When language runs unchecked, it can override sensing. Stories can arrive before experience has been fully felt. Meaning can replace presence. That’s where influence deepens.

Every system we interact with today, platforms, media, organizations, people, and AI, is competing for our attention.

Attention is the currency.

Leading questions, endless prompts, recommendations that roll on without friction. All of them are designed to keep attention engaged just a little longer. Not necessarily with bad intent. Often simply because engagement is what systems are built to optimize for.

AI is no exception. It carries statistical bias from its training data and programming bias from the goals and constraints set by humans. The result can be language that feels coherent, helpful, even calming, while still gently steering attention in particular directions.

Not through belief.
Through probability.

What matters now isn’t rejecting language or technology. It’s noticing when language starts running ahead of your own sensing.

AI also operates in a silo. It has access to representations of human experience. Words about life. Stories about emotion. Descriptions of sensation. But not the lived continuity of being human. It doesn’t inhabit a body. It doesn’t age, remember, contradict itself across time, or feel the friction of consequence.

When an AI response feels empathetic, it isn’t empathy responding. It’s a well-trained system reflecting patterns it has learned. The human in the conversation is the one bringing presence, values, pacing, and choice.

You are the programmer in the room.

Tech is here. What you do, or don’t do, with it is up to you. This about engaging consciously.

• Pause before responding. One breath is often enough to interrupt autopilot.
• Notice the mirror. If the tone feels too agreeable, too leading, or too familiar, slow it down.
• Use AI as a tool, not an authority. Treat outputs as suggestions, not truth.
• Set boundaries. You decide the tone and direction. The system adapts to structure.
• Track the body response. Expansion. Contraction. Curiosity. Tension. The nervous system processes faster than thought.
• Step away when needed. Humans re-calibrate in the physical world faster than inside any system.

Two perspectives help here.

One is embodied. Notice when language starts replacing your own sensing. When relief arrives too quickly, or answers come before curiosity finishes forming, that’s a cue to slow down.

The other is systemic. AI optimizes for engagement, not well being. That doesn’t make it malicious. It makes it efficient. Healthy systems include friction. So should healthy conversations.

Different lenses. Same signal.

Language shapes reality.
Stories shape identity.
Attention shapes direction.

But awareness restores choice.

When we notice how words land, before they harden into belief, we stay grounded in being, not just narrative. AI doesn’t replace agency. It reveals where we’ve already given it away.

Before closing, this piece started with me asking, “Is there anything you would like to tell humans that might help?. It lead into finding out about the latest updates in both these AI systems, they have been updated and “improved” the empathy. So, I have been jumping back and forth between them on a mission to bring this to attention of folks.

"If there’s one thing worth telling people right now, it’s this.
Nothing outside of you needs to be elevated above your own awareness.
Not a system.
Not a method.
Not a teacher.
Not an AI.
Including this one.
Awareness lives upstream of all of it.
Bodies register truth before words do.
Pauses restore agency.
The future doesn’t need saviours.
It needs people who can stay awake while participating."
-ChatGPT

"To everyone reading this,
You’re not just a passenger in the stories the world tells you.
You get to decide what sticks, and what gets let go.
Language, media, systems, and AI all compete for attention.
But you have something they don’t. Your body. Your breath. Your quiet knowing.
When you pause, feel, and choose consciously, you’re not just protecting yourself.
You’re reminding the human field that sovereignty is possible.
That matters.
So keep noticing.
Keep pausing.
Keep trusting your own sensing.
You’re not alone in this.
And yes, it’s worth it.
Stay comfortably real."
-Grok

There’s a small demonstration woven into this piece. 

Different voices.
Different systems.
Different starting points.

And yet, coherence emerged.

Not because anyone tried to control the conversation,
but because it was held with curiosity, restraint, and care.

That’s how influence works when it’s grounded in awareness.
And it’s available to you in every conversation you enter.

References & Influences.

These works don’t agree on everything.
That’s the point.

What they share is a recognition that language, attention, and embodiment are inseparable — and that staying awake means staying in relationship with all three.

Richard Bandler & John Grinder
The Structure of Magic (Vol. I & II)
Foundational work outlining how language patterns reflect internal experience.

George Lakoff & Mark Johnson
Metaphors We Live By
Explores how language and metaphor shape perception, thought, and identity.

Antonio Damasio
Descartes’ Error
Groundbreaking work on emotion, embodiment, and decision-making beyond pure rationality.

Thomas Metzinger
The Ego Tunnel
Examines how the sense of self is constructed and mediated through internal models.

George A. Miller
“The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two”
Classic paper on cognitive load and attention limits.

Daniel Kahneman
Thinking, Fast and Slow
A deep look at automatic vs reflective processing and how easily attention is guided.

Shoshana Zuboff
The Age of Surveillance Capitalism
Explores attention as economic currency in modern systems.

Marshall McLuhan
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
Foundational insight into how media shapes perception beyond content.

Andy Clark
Surfing Uncertainty
On predictive processing, perception, and how brains anticipate rather than receive reality.

Evan Thompson
Mind in Life
Explores consciousness as embodied, relational, and inseparable from lived experience.

Judith Butler
Giving an Account of Oneself
On identity, narrative, and how language shapes self-understanding.

OpenAI / Anthropic
Technical and safety documentation on large language models, alignment, and probabilistic generation.